1. Over more than 30 years, neighborhood NRP programs generated an additional $40.3 million in program income.
• Original Phase I and Phase 2 Neighborhood NRP expenditures were actually $13.3 million more than original allocations.
• Neighborhood NRP programs generated $40.3 million in additional revenue over 30 years. This is called “program income.”
• In five years from 2015 through 2019, NRP expenditures were $18.8 million. Program income was $10.7 million, offsetting more than half of all expenditures.
2. City and NRP deliberately slowed pace of expenditures in Phase 2.
• 2001 State tax reform legislation significantly reduced revenues for NRP Phase 2.
• NRP and City deliberately capped NRP expenditures.
• This delayed rate of expenditures in 2000s.
• Neighborhood organizations had no control over this.
(NRP Policy Board minutes, March 22, 2004)
(NRP RCA, December 8, 2009)
3. City Council reallocated $10 million of NRP funds in 2010.
• This significantly slowed down rate of Phase 2 expenditures in 2010s.
• The funds were restored by City Council action in 2017.
• Neighborhood organizations had no control over this.

(NRP Policy Board Staff Report, March 29, 2017)

4. Housing Vendor Changes from 2014 to 2016
• Due to increasing costs of administering NRP and City home loan and grant programs, CEE significantly increased admin fees in 2014. Many neighborhoods dropped CEE and re-contracted with GMHC.
• In 2016, GMHC announced it was getting out of loan and grant business because it was losing too much money. Many neighborhoods re-contracted all over again.
• Neighborhood organizations had no control over this.

Data above is based on NRP Phase 1 and Phase 2 funds. CPP funds are not included.